From cinelerra-admin@skolelinux.no Sat May 10 14:21:59 2008 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cinelerra@e.kevb.net Delivered-To: cinelerra@e.kevb.net Received: from init.linpro.no (init.linpro.no [87.238.46.2]) by e.kevb.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6991040EBC for ; Sat, 10 May 2008 14:21:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=init.linpro.no) by init.linpro.no with esmtp (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1Juted-0006JJ-VT; Sat, 10 May 2008 20:19:00 +0200 Received: from [193.69.32.11] (helo=virusvask.itsjefen.no) by init.linpro.no with esmtp (Exim 4.50 #1 (Debian)) id 1Jutcw-0006ES-PM for ; Sat, 10 May 2008 20:17:19 +0200 Received: from [193.69.32.11] by 80.232.38.252 (e-nough); Sat, 10 May 19:02:26 2008 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by virusvask.itsjefen.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB8F8AC05B for ; Sat, 10 May 2008 20:16:45 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at virusvask01.itsjefen.no Received: from virusvask.itsjefen.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (virusvask01.itsjefen.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id guNWs-VgucD3 for ; Sat, 10 May 2008 20:16:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from web65407.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (web65407.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [76.13.9.27]) by virusvask.itsjefen.no (Postfix) with SMTP id B0C098AC059 for ; Sat, 10 May 2008 20:16:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 96988 invoked by uid 60001); 10 May 2008 18:16:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=N1+suDXX03PPJH3fRDgp0U2Ara3as6MT4pb6tzoZ8fegPRSiz2TNJ8RnjNjjj+kbwShYsur+GXQVSXokhfkmqzzfANbIm7Fk7vYKqinHxNe6tCz5I47w5Bl+QqjIvFQIbY+nTFvXGphQrML9D5atFpeSFfo4PqYwCrEyBViAnts=; X-YMail-OSG: qTPhuCoVM1ny6J7ndPkOuii30wg6r7yL1Ro7lJ7wAU61PNFDAusdR3thWXub3QfSdlDzMS56yidVgsPEsG1ib30efEyt5Ytb13aq Received: from [71.63.177.90] by web65407.mail.ac4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 10 May 2008 11:16:40 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/975.38 YahooMailWebService/0.7.185 From: robdm2005-osc@yahoo.com Subject: Re: [CinCV] Working on new video transitions for Cinelerra... To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <676678.96441.qm@web65407.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on spamtrap X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=DSPAM=0, FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD=0.375,NO_REAL_NAME=0.339 version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: X-DSPAM-Signature: !DSPAM:4825e339193362349715263! X-DSPAM-Probability: 0.0000 X-DSPAM-Confidence: 0.9997 X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) Sender: cinelerra-admin@skolelinux.no Errors-To: cinelerra-admin@skolelinux.no X-BeenThere: cinelerra@skolelinux.no X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.13 Precedence: bulk Reply-To: cinelerra@skolelinux.no List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: Mailinglist for Cinelerra, the community version List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat, 10 May 2008 11:16:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Score: 0.6 (/) Nope - don't know how it works. I've played with it, but did not know it would get the same exact thing I created. Actually, perhaps I did not explain the one transition I created too well. It is not a wipe like the shape wipe tool does. It slides in the new image (or slides out the old) from the top or bottom, much like the transition that slides in or out from either side. Based on what I have seen of the shape wipe (have not looked at the code yet mind you) I don't think it will do what I've done. At any rate, before I go to far, I will work to understand the shapewipe better to be sure I don't reinvent the wheel. Thanks, Rob ----- Original Message ---- From: Johannes Sixt To: robdm2005-osc@yahoo.com Cc: cinelerra@skolelinux.no Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2008 7:23:38 AM Subject: Re: [CinCV] Working on new video transitions for Cinelerra... On Thursday 08 May 2008 01:15, robdm2005-osc@yahoo.com wrote: > > But I must have missed your original message, so I don't know what the > > transitions would look like that you have in mind. > > Nope - did not miss my original message. I did not say. So far, I just > did a very simple top to bottom or bottom to top swipe modeled like the > side to side one that already exists. This was more of a test to see how > easy it was. I plan to make more with different patters of the edits > coming in or going out. Checkerboard pattern, split from the center or > into the center, etc. > > > Note that you can use the shape wipe plugin to achieve wipes with fancy > > shapes. Cinelerra doesn't need special plugins for that. > > Yes - I saw that. I won't be replicating any of that. So you don't know how ShapeWipe works? ShapeWipe can do top-to-bottom wipes, checkerboard wipes, split from the center or into the center and whatnot. You only have to create a suitable gray-scale png. Look at the examples in $prefix/lib/cinelerra/shapewipe. But, as Herman noted, it does have a few deficiencies. If you spend your time on wipes, then its best invested in improving the ShapeWipe plugin. -- Hannes _______________________________________________ Cinelerra mailing list Cinelerra@skolelinux.no https://init.linpro.no/mailman/skolelinux.no/listinfo/cinelerra